State v. McLeod

533 So. 2d 916, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2545, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5055, 1988 WL 122446
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. McLeod. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Fla. L. Weekly 911
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 1988·No. No. 87-2294·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals and alleges the trial court erred in imposing a sentence under the Youthful Offender Act (YOA) that deviated downward from the sentencing guidelines without a written order stating reasons for the departure. We affirm.

McLeod entered pleas of guilty to the charges of robbery and kidnapping. His sentencing guidelines scoresheet indicated a sentence within the range of five and one-half to seven years incarceration. McLeod was sentenced under the YOA to four years incarceration to be followed by two years community control on each count,, the counts to run concurrently. No written statement setting forth reasons for the departure sentence was filed by the trial court under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(ll).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. McLeod, 533 So. 2d 916, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2545, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5055, 1988 WL 122446 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

533 So. 2d 916 (State v. McLeod) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Nealy
532 So. 2d 1117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)