State v. McLaughlin
76 Mo. 320
Opinion
The judgment in this case is reversed and the cause remanded, for error committed in allowing the prosecuting attorney to cross-examine defendant as to matters and crimes not testified to by him in his testimony in chief. R. S. 1879, § 1918; State v. McGraw, 74 Mo. 573. Other alleged errors are not passed upon.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. McLaughlin, 76 Mo. 320 (Mo. 1882).
76 Mo. 320 (State v. McLaughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. James
115 S.W. 994 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1909)
State v. Hathhorn
65 S.W. 756 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1901)
Lewis v. Territory of Arizona
60 P. 694 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1900)
People v. Arrighini
54 P. 591 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
State v. Elmer
22 S.W. 369 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
State v. Brent
100 Mo. 531 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1890)
State v. Trott
36 Mo. App. 29 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)
State v. Graves
95 Mo. 510 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1888)
State v. Mills
88 Mo. 417 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1885)
State v. Douglass
81 Mo. 231 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)