State v. . McLamb
This text of 125 S.E. 530 (State v. . McLamb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
All the exceptions are based, directly or indirectly, on the .single proposition that the warrant as amended is not sufficient to sustain the verdict. The exceptions cannot be sustained. The amended warrant charges the defendant not only with an assault with a deadly *804 weapon, but with, an assault, whereby serious damage was done, and sets forth with sufficient particularity the nature and extent of the serious damage or injury alleged to have been inflicted. C. S., 1481, 4215; S. v. Huntley, 91 N. C., 617; S. v. Cunningham, 94 N. C., 824; S. v. Shelley, 98 N. C., 673.
We find
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 S.E. 530, 188 N.C. 803, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mclamb-nc-1924.