State v. . McKnight
This text of 185 S.E. 437 (State v. . McKnight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the record as it came from the recorder’s court, the defendant was entitled to a trial de novo in the Superior Court. Ch. 338, sec. 3, Private Laws 1909. The solicitor sought to show by evidence dehors that the defendant entered a plea of guilty in the recorder’s court, and that, therefore, the appeal was only on matters of law, e.g., sufficiency of warrant, validity of statute, or legality of judgment. S. v. Warren, 113 N. C., 683, 18 S. E., 498. Compare S. v. Ingram, 204 N. C., 557, 168 S. E., 837. Without resorting to certiorari or recordari, the judge undertook to determine the question for himself. This was in excess of his authority. S. v. Pasley, 180 N. C., 695, 104 S. E., 533; S. v. Koonce, 108 N. C., 752, 12 S. E., 1032; Neal v. Cowles, 71 N. C., 266.
Let the cause be remanded for disposition sanctioned by law.
Error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 S.E. 437, 210 N.C. 57, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcknight-nc-1936.