State v. . McKnight

185 S.E. 437, 210 N.C. 57, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 14
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 29, 1936·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

On the record as it came from the recorder’s court, the defendant was entitled to a trial de novo in the Superior Court. Ch. 338, sec. 3, Private Laws 1909. The solicitor sought to show by evidence dehors that the defendant entered a plea of guilty in the recorder’s court, and that, therefore, the appeal was only on matters of law, e.g., sufficiency of warrant, validity of statute, or legality of judgment. S. v. Warren, 113 N. C., 683, 18 S. E., 498. Compare S. v. Ingram, 204 N. C., 557, 168 S. E., 837. Without resorting to certiorari or recordari, the judge undertook to determine the question for himself. This was in excess of his authority. S. v. Pasley, 180 N. C., 695, 104 S. E., 533; S. v. Koonce, 108 N. C., 752, 12 S. E., 1032; Neal v. Cowles, 71 N. C., 266.

Let the cause be remanded for disposition sanctioned by law.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . McKnight, 185 S.E. 437, 210 N.C. 57, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 14 (N.C. 1936).

185 S.E. 437 (State v. . McKnight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Crandall
33 S.E.2d 861 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)
In Re Steele
18 S.E.2d 132 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
State v. . Abbott
11 S.E.2d 539 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
State v. . Cox
5 S.E.2d 125 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)