State v. McKinley

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. McKinley

494 N.E.2d 1113, 24 Ohio St. 3d 208, 24 Ohio B. 434, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 675

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 2, 1986·No. No. 86-430·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The motion for leave to appeal is allowed as to Proposition of Law No. I and overruled as to Proposition of Law No. II. As so allowed, the judgment of the court of appeals (case No. 50016) is reversed on authority of State v. Preston (1986), 23 Ohio St. 3d 64, and the cause is remanded to the court of common pleas for proceedings consistent with this entry.

Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents. Celebrezze, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion for leave to appeal is allowed as to Proposition of Law No. I and overruled as to Proposition of Law No. II. As so allowed, the judgment of the court of appeals (case No. 50016) is reversed on authority of State v. Preston (1986), 23 Ohio St. 3d 64, and the cause is remanded to the court of common pleas for proceedings consistent with this entry.

Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents. Celebrezze, C.J., not participating.

State v. McKinley, 494 N.E.2d 1113, 24 Ohio St. 3d 208, 24 Ohio B. 434, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 675 (Ohio 1986).

Pincite

494 N.E.2d 1113 (State v. McKinley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related