State v. McKinley

494 N.E.2d 1113, 24 Ohio St. 3d 208, 24 Ohio B. 434, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 675
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 2, 1986
DocketNo. 86-430
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 494 N.E.2d 1113 (State v. McKinley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McKinley, 494 N.E.2d 1113, 24 Ohio St. 3d 208, 24 Ohio B. 434, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 675 (Ohio 1986).

Opinion

The motion for leave to appeal is allowed as to Proposition of Law No. I and overruled as to Proposition of Law No. II. As so allowed, the judgment of the court of appeals (case No. 50016) is reversed on authority of State v. Preston (1986), 23 Ohio St. 3d 64, and the cause is remanded to the court of common pleas for proceedings consistent with this entry.

Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents. Celebrezze, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Maynard
526 N.E.2d 316 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
494 N.E.2d 1113, 24 Ohio St. 3d 208, 24 Ohio B. 434, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mckinley-ohio-1986.