State v. McKinlay
237 A.2d 264, 51 N.J. 25, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 135
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, 98 N. J. Super. 280, 237 A. 2d 274.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Goldmann, Schettino and Haneman—7.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. McKinlay, 237 A.2d 264, 51 N.J. 25, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 135 (N.J. 1968).
237 A.2d 264 (State v. McKinlay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)