State v. McKay

460 S.W.3d 480, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 359, 2015 WL 1548868
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 7, 2015
DocketNo. ED 101042
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 460 S.W.3d 480 (State v. McKay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McKay, 460 S.W.3d 480, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 359, 2015 WL 1548868 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Daniel McKay (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s order and judgment entered following remand from this Court for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the State could rebut the presumption of prejudice caused by the delay in bringing Defendant to trial and whether Defendant’s right to a speedy trial was violated. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniel K. McKay v. State of Missouri
504 S.W.3d 111 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016)
Daniel McKay v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
460 S.W.3d 480, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 359, 2015 WL 1548868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mckay-moctapp-2015.