State v. McHone

539 S.E.2d 642, 350 N.C. 825, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 988
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided August 19, 1999·No. No. 148A91-4·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

) ) ) ORDER ) )

Defendant’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari is allowed for the limited purpose of entering the following order:

Defendant’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari is treated and reviewed by this Court as a Motion for Appropriate Relief filed with this Court, and as incorporating and including all claims and allegations set forth in defendant’s amended Motion for Appropriate Relief and defendant’s original and supplemented Motions for Appropriate Relief as previously filed in the trial court, and this Court having thoroughly considered the matters raised therein and having determined that none require any further evidentiary hearing and that none merit any further grounds for relief, the motion is therefore DENIED.

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 19th day of August, 1999.

George L. Wainwright, Jr.

For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. McHone, 539 S.E.2d 642, 350 N.C. 825, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 988 (N.C. 1999).

539 S.E.2d 642 (State v. McHone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McHone v. Polk
392 F.3d 691 (Fourth Circuit, 2005)