State v. McGuire

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

State v. McGuire

22 A. 1118, 15 R.I. 23, 1885 R.I. LEXIS 43

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedMay 22, 1885

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 22 A. 1118 (State v. McGuire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McGuire, 22 A. 1118, 15 R.I. 23, 1885 R.I. LEXIS 43 (R.I. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only question raised by the exceptions is whether, i£ a defendant on the trial of an indictment against him testifies in his own behalf, it is competent for the State to introduce the record of his previous conviction of a felony to impeach his credibility as a witness. We think there can be no doubt that such testimony is admissible. At common law a person after such conviction was incompetent to testify, and upon production of the record was utterly excluded. Our statute modifies the common law by providing that such a person “ shall be admitted to testify like any other witness, except that such conviction or sentence may be shown to affect his credibility.” Pub. Stat. R. I. cap. 214, § 38. Under this provision the credibility of any ordinary witness who has been convicted of felony can be impeached by the production of the record of his conviction. The only question, therefore, is whether a defendant in a criminal or civil case, who tabes the witness stand in his own behalf, is privileged beyond ordinary witnesses from impeachment in this manner. We can see no reason why he should be. The enabling provision is simply, “ No respondent in a criminal prosecution, offering himself as a witness, shall be excluded from testifying because he is such respondent.” Pub. Stat. R. I. cap. 214, § 39. We think that when *24 he testifies as a witness on his own oiler, he becomes liable to impeachment like any other witness. Exceptions overruled.

Samuel P. Colt, Attorney General, for plaintiff. George J. West, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only question raised by the exceptions is whether, i£ a defendant on the trial of an indictment against him testifies in his own behalf, it is competent for the State to introduce the record of his previous conviction of a felony to impeach his credibility as a witness. We think there can be no doubt that such testimony is admissible. At common law a person after such conviction was incompetent to testify, and upon production of the record was utterly excluded. Our statute modifies the common law by providing that such a person “ shall be admitted to testify like any other witness, except that such conviction or sentence may be shown to affect his credibility.” Pub. Stat. R. I. cap. 214, § 38. Under this provision the credibility of any ordinary witness who has been convicted of felony can be impeached by the production of the record of his conviction. The only question, therefore, is whether a defendant in a criminal or civil case, who tabes the witness stand in his own behalf, is privileged beyond ordinary witnesses from impeachment in this manner. We can see no reason why he should be. The enabling provision is simply, “ No respondent in a criminal prosecution, offering himself as a witness, shall be excluded from testifying because he is such respondent.” Pub. Stat. R. I. cap. 214, § 39. We think that when *24 he testifies as a witness on his own oiler, he becomes liable to impeachment like any other witness. Exceptions overruled.

Samuel P. Colt, Attorney General, for plaintiff. George J. West, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A. 1118, 15 R.I. 23, 1885 R.I. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcguire-ri-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack