Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. McGrew

State v. McGrew

902 P.2d 139, 137 Or. App. 144, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1373
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 27, 1995
Docket66989; CA A83930
StatusPublished

This text of 902 P.2d 139 (State v. McGrew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McGrew, 902 P.2d 139, 137 Or. App. 144, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1373 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was charged by information in district court with stalking, committed from September through November 1993, in violation of ORS 163.732, a Class A misdemeanor. The trial court dismissed the case on defendant’s pretrial demurrer, ruling that the stalking statute is unconstitutionally vague. See State v. Norris-Romine/Finley, 134 Or App 204, 894 P2d 1221 (1995). The district court lacked jurisdiction over the charges. State v. Rudder, 133 Or App 174, 889 P2d 1367, mod State v. Rudder/Webb, 137 Or App 43, 903 P2d 393 (1995).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Norris-Romine
894 P.2d 1221 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)
State v. Rudder
889 P.2d 1367 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)
State v. Rudder
903 P.2d 393 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
902 P.2d 139, 137 Or. App. 144, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcgrew-orctapp-1995.