State v. McGrew

902 P.2d 139, 137 Or. App. 144, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1373
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 27, 1995·No. 66989; CA A83930·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was charged by information in district court with stalking, committed from September through November 1993, in violation of ORS 163.732, a Class A misdemeanor. The trial court dismissed the case on defendant’s pretrial demurrer, ruling that the stalking statute is unconstitutionally vague. See State v. Norris-Romine/Finley, 134 Or App 204, 894 P2d 1221 (1995). The district court lacked jurisdiction over the charges. State v. Rudder, 133 Or App 174, 889 P2d 1367, mod State v. Rudder/Webb, 137 Or App 43, 903 P2d 393 (1995).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. McGrew, 902 P.2d 139, 137 Or. App. 144, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1373 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

902 P.2d 139 (State v. McGrew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Norris-Romine
894 P.2d 1221 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)
State v. Rudder
889 P.2d 1367 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)
State v. Rudder
903 P.2d 393 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)