State v. McGrath
142 A. 918, 105 N.J.L. 251, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 348
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per euriam in the Supreme Court.
*252 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn, Katzenbach, White, Yan Buskirk, MgGlennon, Kays, Dear, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. McGrath, 142 A. 918, 105 N.J.L. 251, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 348 (N.J. 1928).
142 A. 918 (State v. McGrath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.