State v. McGowan (Slip Opinion)

2016 Ohio 2971
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 17, 2016
Docket2015-1596
StatusPublished
Cited by32 cases

This text of 2016 Ohio 2971 (State v. McGowan (Slip Opinion)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McGowan (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 2971 (Ohio 2016).

Opinion

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. McGowan, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-2971.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2016-OHIO-2971 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MCGOWAN, APPELLANT. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. McGowan, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-2971.] Criminal law—Felony Sentencing—Standard of review upon appeal of sentence— R.C. 2953.08(G)(2)—Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for application of State v. Marcum. (No. 2015-1596—Submitted April 7, 2016—Decided May 17, 2016.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 27092, 2015-Ohio-1804. __________________ {¶ 1} In State v. Marcum, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-1002, ___ N.E.3d ___, we held that R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) allows an appellate court to increase, reduce, or otherwise modify a sentence only when it clearly and convincingly finds that the sentence is (1) contrary to law and/or (2) unsupported by the record. Id. at ¶ 7. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals in the instant case is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of Marcum. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. _________________ Sherri Bevan Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard S. Kasay, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. James W. Armstrong, for appellant. _________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jendrusik
2022 Ohio 3525 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)
State v. Eitzman
2022 Ohio 574 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)
State v. Wilson
2022 Ohio 504 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)
State v. Silvas
2021 Ohio 4473 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021)
State v. Berry
2021 Ohio 1132 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021)
State v. Risner
2021 Ohio 342 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021)
State v. Purvis
2021 Ohio 265 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021)
State v. Walker
2020 Ohio 4512 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
State v. Rodgers
2020 Ohio 4173 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
State v. Graham
2020 Ohio 1063 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
State v. Jones
2019 Ohio 4938 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Ogletree
2019 Ohio 3999 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Hope
2019 Ohio 3719 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Murrill
2019 Ohio 3318 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Arledge
2019 Ohio 3147 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Whitaker
2019 Ohio 2823 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Starr
2019 Ohio 2081 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. King
2019 Ohio 1492 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Ford
2019 Ohio 1196 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Ware
2018 Ohio 2294 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 Ohio 2971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcgowan-slip-opinion-ohio-2016.