State v. McGowan
62 N.E.3d 178, 147 Ohio St. 3d 166
Opinion
{¶ 1} In State v. Marcum, 146 Ohio St.3d 516, 2016-Ohio-1002, 59 N.E.3d 1231, we held that R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) allows an appellate court to increase, reduce, or otherwise modify a sentence only when it clearly and convincingly finds that the sentence is (1) contrary to law and/or (2) unsupported by the record. Id. at ¶ 7.
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals in the instant case is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of Marcum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. McGowan, 62 N.E.3d 178, 147 Ohio St. 3d 166 (Ohio 2016).
62 N.E.3d 178 (State v. McGowan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Jendrusik
2022 Ohio 3525 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)
State v. Eitzman
2022 Ohio 574 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)
State v. Wilson
2022 Ohio 504 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)
State v. Silvas
2021 Ohio 4473 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021)
State v. Berry
2021 Ohio 1132 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021)
State v. Risner
2021 Ohio 342 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021)
State v. Purvis
2021 Ohio 265 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021)
State v. Walker
2020 Ohio 4512 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
State v. Rodgers
2020 Ohio 4173 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
State v. Graham
2020 Ohio 1063 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
State v. Jones
2019 Ohio 4938 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Ogletree
2019 Ohio 3999 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Hope
2019 Ohio 3719 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Murrill
2019 Ohio 3318 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Arledge
2019 Ohio 3147 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Whitaker
2019 Ohio 2823 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Starr
2019 Ohio 2081 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. King
2019 Ohio 1492 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Ford
2019 Ohio 1196 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Ware
2018 Ohio 2294 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2018)