State v. McGowan

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McGowan

168 S.W.3d 698, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 972, 2005 WL 1514180

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 28, 2005

DocketNo. ED 85150

StatusPublished

This text of 168 S.W.3d 698 (State v. McGowan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McGowan, 168 S.W.3d 698, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 972, 2005 WL 1514180 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Glen McGowan (“defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of interfering with an arrest in violation of section 575.150 RSMo (2000).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Glen McGowan (“defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of interfering with an arrest in violation of section 575.150 RSMo (2000).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 S.W.3d 698, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 972, 2005 WL 1514180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcgowan-moctapp-2005.