State v. McFarland

Court of Appeals of Washington

State v. McFarland

476 P.2d 727, 3 Wash. App. 647, 1970 Wash. App. LEXIS 1006

CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington

DecidedNovember 19, 1970

DocketNo. 86-2

StatusPublished

This text of 476 P.2d 727 (State v. McFarland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McFarland, 476 P.2d 727, 3 Wash. App. 647, 1970 Wash. App. LEXIS 1006 (Wash. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

James Evert McFarland was convicted of unlawful possession of narcotic drugs—marijuana. The parties have stipulated that State v. Zornes, 78 W.D.2d 9, 456, 475 P.2d 109 (1970) is controlling and requires reversal and dismissal. We agree. For the reasons set forth in that case, this conviction is reversed and the action dismissed. See State v. Williams, 78 W.D.2d 459, 475 P.2d 100 (1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

James Evert McFarland was convicted of unlawful possession of narcotic drugs—marijuana. The parties have stipulated that State v. Zornes, 78 W.D.2d 9, 456, 475 P.2d 109 (1970) is controlling and requires reversal and dismissal. We agree. For the reasons set forth in that case, this conviction is reversed and the action dismissed. See State v. Williams, 78 W.D.2d 459, 475 P.2d 100 (1970).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

476 P.2d 727, 3 Wash. App. 647, 1970 Wash. App. LEXIS 1006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcfarland-washctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack