State v. McFarland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. McFarland

687 P.2d 818, 69 Or. App. 746, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4207

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 19, 1984

Docket82-1072-C, 82-1326-C, 83-1329-C; CA A31214, CA A31215, CA A31216

StatusPublished

This text of 687 P.2d 818 (State v. McFarland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McFarland, 687 P.2d 818, 69 Or. App. 746, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4207 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In these consolidated criminal appeals, defendant challenges his sentences as excessive and argues that the trial court was without jurisdiction to make them consecutive. We find no error. On a third matter, defendant argues — and the state agrees — that the sentencing order in case number 82-1326-C, which presently indicates that he was convicted of assault in the second degree, must be modified to reflect the fact that he was actually charged with and convicted of assault in the third degree. It is so ordered. See Or Const, Art VII (Amended), § 3.

Judgment in case numbers 82-1072-C and 83-1329-C affirmed; judgment in case number 82-1326-C modified to conviction of assault in the third degree and, as modified, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In these consolidated criminal appeals, defendant challenges his sentences as excessive and argues that the trial court was without jurisdiction to make them consecutive. We find no error. On a third matter, defendant argues — and the state agrees — that the sentencing order in case number 82-1326-C, which presently indicates that he was convicted of assault in the second degree, must be modified to reflect the fact that he was actually charged with and convicted of assault in the third degree. It is so ordered. See Or Const, Art VII (Amended), § 3.

Judgment in case numbers 82-1072-C and 83-1329-C affirmed; judgment in case number 82-1326-C modified to conviction of assault in the third degree and, as modified, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

687 P.2d 818, 69 Or. App. 746, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcfarland-orctapp-1984.