State v. McFarland
65 S.E.2d 130, 233 N.C. 648, 1951 N.C. LEXIS 359
This text of 65 S.E.2d 130 (State v. McFarland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. McFarland, 65 S.E.2d 130, 233 N.C. 648, 1951 N.C. LEXIS 359 (N.C. 1951).
Opinion
This cause resolved itself into an issue of fact. There was ample testimony offered by the State to repel defendant’s demurrer to the evidence and require its submission to the jury. The assignments of error brought forward by defendant and discussed in his brief fail to disclose cause for disturbing the verdict. Upon the consideration of the whole record we find in the trial
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
65 S.E.2d 130, 233 N.C. 648, 1951 N.C. LEXIS 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcfarland-nc-1951.