State v. McFadden

193 S.W.3d 305, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 268, 2006 WL 539101
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 7, 2006
DocketNo. ED 85858
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 S.W.3d 305 (State v. McFadden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McFadden, 193 S.W.3d 305, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 268, 2006 WL 539101 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vincent McFadden appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of first-degree assault; two counts of armed criminal action; and one count of unlawful use of a weapon. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McFadden v. State
349 S.W.3d 449 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 S.W.3d 305, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 268, 2006 WL 539101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcfadden-moctapp-2006.