State v. McEnroe

287 N.W. 817, 69 N.D. 445, 1939 N.D. LEXIS 170
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 9, 1939
DocketFile No. Cr. 170.
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 287 N.W. 817 (State v. McEnroe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McEnroe, 287 N.W. 817, 69 N.D. 445, 1939 N.D. LEXIS 170 (N.D. 1939).

Opinion

Christianson, J.

The defendant moved that the information ydiich had been filed against him be set aside. Comp. Laws 1913, §§ 10,728-10,730. The motion was granted, and the state has appealed.

The defendant moves that the appeal be dismissed-on-the ground that the state has no right to appeal from an order setting aside an information.

The motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted. The right of appeal is statutory. Myrick v. McCabe, 5 N. D. 422, 67 N. W. 143; Whitney v. Ritz, 24 N. D. 576, 140 N. W. 676; Stimson v. Stimson, 30 N. D. 78, 152 N. W. 132; Torgerson v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. *446 Ste. M. R. Co. 51 N. D. 745, 200 N. W. 1013; State v. Sweeney, 48 S. D. 248, 203 N. W. 460. See also State v. Fortune, 29 N. D. 289, 150 N. W. 926; State v. Stunkard, 28 S. D. 311, 133 N. W. 253. In a criminal action the state has only such right of appeal as is expressly conferred by law. 17 C. J. p. 39; United States v. Sanges, 144 U. S. 310, 36 L. ed. 445, 12 S. Ct. 609; State v. Stunkard, 28 S. D. 311, 133 N. W. 253, and State v. Sweeney, 48 S. D. 248, 203 N. W. 460, supra; People v. Herbert, 152 App. Div. 579, 137 N. Y. S. 409; People v. Dundon, 113 App. Div. 369, 98 N. Y. S. 1048; People v. Knowles, 27 Cal. App. 498, 155 P. 140; Note in 19 L.R.A. pp. 345 et seq.

Under our laws (Comp. Laws 1913, § 10,993) the state has the right to appeal only,

“1. From a judgment for the defendant on a demurrer to the information or indictment.

“2. From an order granting a new trial.

“3. From an order arresting judgment.

“4. From an order made after judgment, affecting any substantial right of the state.

“5. From an order of the court directing the jury to find for the defendant.”

The order sought to be appealed from here is not one of those from which the state may appeal. Comp. Laws 1913, § 10,993; State v. Fortune, 29 N. D. 289, 150 N. W. 926; People v. Herbert, 152 App. Div. 579, 137 N. Y. S. 409; and People v. Knowles, 27 Cal. App. 498, 155 P. 140, supra.

Appeal dismissed.

Nuessle, Ch. J., and Burr, Burke, and Morris, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gawryluk
351 N.W.2d 94 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1984)
State v. Borden
316 N.W.2d 93 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1982)
State v. Fields
294 N.W.2d 404 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1980)
State v. Fischer
270 N.W.2d 345 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1978)
State v. Rueb
249 N.W.2d 506 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1976)
State v. Howe
247 N.W.2d 647 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1976)
State v. Allesi
211 N.W.2d 733 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1973)
State v. Bauer
153 N.W.2d 895 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1967)
Culver v. Nelson
54 N.W.2d 7 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1952)
Anderson v. Bothum
45 N.W.2d 488 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1950)
Helland v. Jones
37 N.W.2d 513 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
287 N.W. 817, 69 N.D. 445, 1939 N.D. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcenroe-nd-1939.