State v. McElya
This text of 2011 ND 137 (State v. McElya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 7/13/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2011 ND 129
In the Interest of A.S., D.S., F.S., J.S., Jr., and K.S., minor children
Emeline Burkett, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
L.S., Mother, J.S., Father,
R.V., Father, B.R., Father, Respondents
L.S., Mother, Appellant
Nos. 20110116-20110120
Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas E. Merrick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Fredrick R. Fremgen, State’s Attorney, 511 2nd Ave. SE, Jamestown, ND 58401, for petitioner and appellee.
Erica Shively, Bismarck/Mandan Public Defenders’ Office, 314 E. Thayer Ave., Ste. 200, Bismarck, ND 58501, for appellant.
Interest of A.S., D.S., F.S., J.S., Jr., and K.S.
[¶1] L.S. appealed from a juvenile court judgment terminating her parental rights to her children. L.S. argues the juvenile court’s finding that reasonable efforts were made to reunify her family is clearly erroneous. She also argues the juvenile court’s findings that the conditions and causes of the children’s deprivation are likely to continue and that the children would likely suffer harm absent termination are clearly erroneous. These findings are not clearly erroneous. We affirm the juvenile court judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 ND 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcelya-nd-2011.