State v. McElveen
985 A.2d 1063, 294 Conn. 924, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 10
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 117 Conn. App. 486 (AC 29638), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Whether the sole appropriate relief in the present case was the elimination of the sentence enhancement pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-40?
“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘no,’ did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the appeal as moot?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. McElveen, 985 A.2d 1063, 294 Conn. 924, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 10 (Colo. 2010).
985 A.2d 1063 (State v. McElveen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. McElveen
29 A.3d 897 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
State v. Henderson
24 A.3d 35 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
McKenna v. Delente
2 A.3d 38 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)