State v. McElveen

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. McElveen

985 A.2d 1063, 294 Conn. 924, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 10

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJanuary 5, 2010

DocketSC 18522

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 985 A.2d 1063 (State v. McElveen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McElveen, 985 A.2d 1063, 294 Conn. 924, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 10 (Colo. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 117 Conn. App. 486 (AC 29638), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Whether the sole appropriate relief in the present case was the elimination of the sentence enhancement pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-40?

“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘no,’ did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the appeal as moot?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

*925 Decided January 5, 2010 Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI