State v. McDowell

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McDowell

308 S.W.3d 310, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 473, 2010 WL 1555122

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 20, 2010·No. ED 92715·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Cortez McDowell, appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree robbery, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment. No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Cortez McDowell, appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree robbery, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment. No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. McDowell, 308 S.W.3d 310, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 473, 2010 WL 1555122 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

308 S.W.3d 310 (State v. McDowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.