State v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Vermont

State v. McDonald

674 A.2d 797, 165 Vt. 545, 1996 Vt. LEXIS 13

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedFebruary 26, 1996

DocketNo. 94-476

StatusPublished

This text of 674 A.2d 797 (State v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McDonald, 674 A.2d 797, 165 Vt. 545, 1996 Vt. LEXIS 13 (Vt. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Appellant has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion, under VR.Cr.E 16.2(c), in ordering that the originals of complainant’s letters and diaries be returned to complainant and that all copies be turned over to the district court for destruction. See State v. Vincent, 156 Vt. 259, 263-64, 591 A.2d 65, 68 (1991) (trial court has broad discretion in controlling discovery).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellant has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion, under VR.Cr.E 16.2(c), in ordering that the originals of complainant’s letters and diaries be returned to complainant and that all copies be turned over to the district court for destruction. See State v. Vincent, 156 Vt. 259, 263-64, 591 A.2d 65, 68 (1991) (trial court has broad discretion in controlling discovery).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

674 A.2d 797, 165 Vt. 545, 1996 Vt. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcdonald-vt-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack