State v. McDonald
This text of 68 N.E.2d 114 (State v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant, while seated in a parked automobile on a downtown street corner of Cincinnati, was arrested, charged, under an ordinance of the city of Cincinnati, with being a known thief, and convicted on that charge in the Municipal Court of Cincinnati.
The sole evidence introduced was a criminal record, showing a robbery conviction in 1931, convictions of loitering in 1929, probation on a charge of carrying concealed weapons in 1930, consorting in 1943, and a conviction in federal court for sending poison through the mails in 1943.
From the above record it .appears that there is no substantial evidence of thievery in recent years, which it is the object of the ordinance to suppress.
Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the Municipal Court, with instructions to discharge the defendant.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 N.E.2d 114, 77 Ohio App. 396, 33 Ohio Op. 238, 1946 Ohio App. LEXIS 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcdonald-ohioctapp-1946.