State v. McDonald

70 P. 724, 27 Mont. 230, 1902 Mont. LEXIS 112
Montana Supreme Court·Decided December 1, 1902·No. No. 1,842·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MB. JUSTICE MILBUBN

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant, appellant, was convicted in the district court of Silver Bow county of the crime of grand larceny, having been informed against with one other. Erom the order denying his motion for a new trial and from the judgment he has appealed.

Thirteen assignments of error are made. We have carefully considered all assignments, and we do not find any error made by the court.

[234]*234We add, however, that the submitting of written instructions to the jury with the signatures of the several counsel attached to them, as in this case, is not to be commended.

Let the order and judgment appealed from be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. McDonald, 70 P. 724, 27 Mont. 230, 1902 Mont. LEXIS 112 (Mo. 1902).

70 P. 724 (State v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thornton-Thomas Mercantile Co. v. Bretherton
80 P. 10 (Montana Supreme Court, 1905)
State v. Martin
74 P. 725 (Montana Supreme Court, 1903)