State v. McDonald
This text of 916 So. 2d 431 (State v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For the reasons assigned in the companion and consolidated case, State v. Dustin K. Runyon, 05-36 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/02/05), 916 So.2d 407, 2005 WL 2863763, Defendant McDonald’s convictions are affirmed. His sentence for second degree murder is affirmed, but his sentence for attempted second degree murder is vacated, and the case remanded for re-sentencing. The trial court is instructed that the entirety of the sentence imposed for attempted second degree murder must be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
916 So. 2d 431, 2005 La. App. LEXIS 2274, 2005 WL 2863906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcdonald-lactapp-2005.