State v. McDonald

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. McDonald

916 So. 2d 431, 2005 La. App. LEXIS 2274, 2005 WL 2863906

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided November 2, 2005·No. No. 05-104·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SULLIVAN, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion and consolidated case, State v. Dustin K. Runyon, 05-36 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/02/05), 916 So.2d 407, 2005 WL 2863763, Defendant McDonald’s convictions are affirmed. His sentence for second degree murder is affirmed, but his sentence for attempted second degree murder is vacated, and the case remanded for re-sentencing. The trial court is instructed that the entirety of the sentence imposed for attempted second degree murder must be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SULLIVAN, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion and consolidated case, State v. Dustin K. Runyon, 05-36 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/02/05), 916 So.2d 407, 2005 WL 2863763, Defendant McDonald’s convictions are affirmed. His sentence for second degree murder is affirmed, but his sentence for attempted second degree murder is vacated, and the case remanded for re-sentencing. The trial court is instructed that the entirety of the sentence imposed for attempted second degree murder must be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

State v. McDonald, 916 So. 2d 431, 2005 La. App. LEXIS 2274, 2005 WL 2863906 (La. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

916 So. 2d 431 (State v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related