State v. McDermott

2025 ND 39
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 13, 2025
DocketNo. 20240150
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 ND 39 (State v. McDermott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McDermott, 2025 ND 39 (N.D. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2025 ND 39

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Travis Everett McDermott, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20240150

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Todd L. Cresap, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Tiffany M. Sorgen, Assistant State’s Attorney, Minot, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee.

Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, N.D., for defendant and appellant. State v. McDermott No. 20240150

[¶1] Travis McDermott appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of manslaughter and reckless endangerment with a firearm. On appeal, McDermott argues that the district court committed obvious error by failing to declare a mistrial after some of the jury pool allegedly observed McDermott in restraints prior to voir dire.

[¶2] McDermott waived his claim of error when he raised the issue with the district court but then expressly withdrew any objection, stating that he wished to move forward with trial. McDermott informed his attorney that some of the jury pool had seen him in restraints prior to voir dire; McDermott’s attorney raised the issue with the district court, and after discussion on the record, McDermott’s attorney informed the court “he has indicated that he is prepared to move forward today despite what happened.” We summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). State v. Studhorse, 2024 ND 110, ¶ 25, 7 N.W.3d 253 (explaining that a party waives a claim of error by affirmatively stating he has “no objection” or requests for jury instructions).

[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Studhorse
2024 ND 110 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 ND 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcdermott-nd-2025.