State v. McDaniels

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McDaniels

220 S.W.3d 310, 2006 WL 2864734

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 18, 2007·No. ED 86980·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jerome McDaniels (“McDaniels”) appeals the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of attempted first degree robbery and armed criminal action. McDaniels alleges the trial court erred in overruling his objection to the peremptory striking of two African American women and in overruling McDaniel’s motion to suppress and his objection to out of court identifications.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jerome McDaniels (“McDaniels”) appeals the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of attempted first degree robbery and armed criminal action. McDaniels alleges the trial court erred in overruling his objection to the peremptory striking of two African American women and in overruling McDaniel’s motion to suppress and his objection to out of court identifications.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. McDaniels, 220 S.W.3d 310, 2006 WL 2864734 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

220 S.W.3d 310 (State v. McDaniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.