State v. McCumbers

943 N.E.2d 571, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1424
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 16, 2011·No. 2011-0200·Published

Opinion

Summit App. No. 25169, 2010-Ohio-6129. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed January 19, 2011:

“Whether, for the purpose of enhancing the offense level in an OVI case, the [sjtate is required to prove the prior OVI convictions by providing a judgment of conviction executed in conformity with Crim.R. 32(C)?”
Pfeifer, J., dissents.

The conflict case is State v. Finney, Fulton App. No. F-06-009, 2006-Ohio-5770.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. McCumbers, 943 N.E.2d 571, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1424 (Ohio 2011).

943 N.E.2d 571 (State v. McCumbers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Finney, Unpublished Decision (11-3-2006)
2006 Ohio 5770 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)