State v. McCumbers
943 N.E.2d 571, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1424
This text of 943 N.E.2d 571 (State v. McCumbers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. McCumbers, 943 N.E.2d 571, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1424 (Ohio 2011).
Opinion
Summit App. No. 25169, 2010-Ohio-6129. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed January 19, 2011:
“Whether, for the purpose of enhancing the offense level in an OVI case, the [sjtate is required to prove the prior OVI convictions by providing a judgment of conviction executed in conformity with Crim.R. 32(C)?”
The conflict case is State v. Finney, Fulton App. No. F-06-009, 2006-Ohio-5770.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Finney, Unpublished Decision (11-3-2006)
2006 Ohio 5770 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
943 N.E.2d 571, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mccumbers-ohio-2011.