Home/Arizona Supreme Court/State v. McCuin

State v. McCuin

829 P.2d 1217, 171 Ariz. 171, 111 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 23, 1992 Ariz. LEXIS 32
CourtArizona Supreme Court
DecidedApril 21, 1992
DocketCR-91-0065-PR
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 829 P.2d 1217 (State v. McCuin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McCuin, 829 P.2d 1217, 171 Ariz. 171, 111 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 23, 1992 Ariz. LEXIS 32 (Ark. 1992).

Opinion

OPINION

FELDMAN, Chief Justice.

The facts of this case are set forth in our opinion in State v. Noble, 171 Ariz. 171, 829 P.2d 1217 (1992), and in the court of appeals’ opinion in State v. McCuin, 167 Ariz. 447, 808 P.2d 332 (Ct.App.1991). For the reasons given in our opinion today in Noble, the trial court judgment is affirmed, and part IV of the court of appeals’ opinion is vacated.

MOELLER, V.C.J., CORCORAN, J., FRANK X. GORDON, Jr., J. (retired), and CARRUTH, Judge, concur. JAMES DUKE CAMERON, J. (retired), did not participate in this matter; pursuant to article 6, § 3 of the Arizona Constitution, JAMES C. CARRUTH, Judge, of the Pima County Superior Court was designated to sit in his stead.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Williams
898 P.2d 497 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1995)
State v. Andersen
868 P.2d 964 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1993)
State v. Boldrey
861 P.2d 663 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1993)
State v. Noble
829 P.2d 1217 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
829 P.2d 1217, 171 Ariz. 171, 111 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 23, 1992 Ariz. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mccuin-ariz-1992.