State v. McCuin

Arizona Supreme Court

State v. McCuin

829 P.2d 1217, 171 Ariz. 171, 111 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 23, 1992 Ariz. LEXIS 32

Arizona Supreme Court·Decided April 21, 1992·No. CR-91-0065-PR·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION

FELDMAN, Chief Justice.

The facts of this case are set forth in our opinion in State v. Noble, 171 Ariz. 171, 829 P.2d 1217 (1992), and in the court of appeals’ opinion in State v. McCuin, 167 Ariz. 447, 808 P.2d 332 (Ct.App.1991). For the reasons given in our opinion today in Noble, the trial court judgment is affirmed, and part IV of the court of appeals’ opinion is vacated.

MOELLER, V.C.J., CORCORAN, J., FRANK X. GORDON, Jr., J. (retired), and CARRUTH, Judge, concur. JAMES DUKE CAMERON, J. (retired), did not participate in this matter; pursuant to article 6, § 3 of the Arizona Constitution, JAMES C. CARRUTH, Judge, of the Pima County Superior Court was designated to sit in his stead.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

FELDMAN, Chief Justice.

The facts of this case are set forth in our opinion in State v. Noble, 171 Ariz. 171, 829 P.2d 1217 (1992), and in the court of appeals’ opinion in State v. McCuin, 167 Ariz. 447, 808 P.2d 332 (Ct.App.1991). For the reasons given in our opinion today in Noble, the trial court judgment is affirmed, and part IV of the court of appeals’ opinion is vacated.

MOELLER, V.C.J., CORCORAN, J., FRANK X. GORDON, Jr., J. (retired), and CARRUTH, Judge, concur. JAMES DUKE CAMERON, J. (retired), did not participate in this matter; pursuant to article 6, § 3 of the Arizona Constitution, JAMES C. CARRUTH, Judge, of the Pima County Superior Court was designated to sit in his stead.

State v. McCuin, 829 P.2d 1217, 171 Ariz. 171, 111 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 23, 1992 Ariz. LEXIS 32 (Ark. 1992).

Pincite

829 P.2d 1217 (State v. McCuin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related