State v. McCrowe

158 S.E.2d 337, 272 N.C. 523, 1968 N.C. LEXIS 695
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 12, 1968·No. 833·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The defendant contends: (1) the record does not disclose he was represented by counsel at his trial before the Recorder, and (2) that sentences on two of the counts does not permit a prison sentence of 90 days. However, the verdict of guilty on the count charging operating the Chevrolet at 85 m.p.h. in a 55 m.p.h. zone on U. S. Highway 301 will sustain the judgment.

In cases in which there is a verdict or plea of guilty to more than one count in a warrant or bill of indictment, and the Court imposes a single judgment (sentence, or fine, or both) a consolidation for the purpose of judgment will be presumed. The punishment may not exceed that permitted on the major count. Appointment of counsel was not required in this case.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. McCrowe, 158 S.E.2d 337, 272 N.C. 523, 1968 N.C. LEXIS 695 (N.C. 1968).

158 S.E.2d 337 (State v. McCrowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Long
340 S.E.2d 392 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1986)
State v. Williams
203 S.E.2d 399 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
State v. Brady
196 S.E.2d 813 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)
State v. Crabb
176 S.E.2d 39 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)