State v. McCrorey

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. McCrorey

DecidedNovember 25, 2015

Docket2015-UP-538

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. McCrorey (State v. McCrorey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McCrorey, (S.C. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Teramine Lamont McCrorey, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-002192

Appeal From York County J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-538 Submitted October 1, 2015 – Filed November 25, 2015

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Benjamin John Tripp, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Ellis Roberts, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Dicapua, 373 S.C. 452, 455, 646 S.E.2d 150, 152 (Ct. App. 2007) (holding the defendant's statement that he had no objection to the admission of certain evidence "amounted to a waiver of any issue [he] had with the [evidence]"), aff'd, 383 S.C. 394, 680 S.E.2d 292 (2009); id. at 456, 646 S.E.2d at 152 (holding a party's "express waiver of objection to the admission of" evidence is "tantamount to a withdrawal of [that party's] previous motion to suppress" (quoting Martelly v. State, 187 A.2d 105, 108 (Md. 1963))).

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Teramine Lamont McCrorey, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-002192

Appeal From York County J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-538 Submitted October 1, 2015 – Filed November 25, 2015

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Benjamin John Tripp, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Ellis Roberts, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Dicapua, 373 S.C. 452, 455, 646 S.E.2d 150, 152 (Ct. App. 2007) (holding the defendant's statement that he had no objection to the admission of certain evidence "amounted to a waiver of any issue [he] had with the [evidence]"), aff'd, 383 S.C. 394, 680 S.E.2d 292 (2009); id. at 456, 646 S.E.2d at 152 (holding a party's "express waiver of objection to the admission of" evidence is "tantamount to a withdrawal of [that party's] previous motion to suppress" (quoting Martelly v. State, 187 A.2d 105, 108 (Md. 1963))).

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. McCrorey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mccrorey-scctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack