State v. McCray

747 S.E.2d 572, 367 N.C. 226, 2013 WL 4781747, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 943
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. McCray. Read the opinion of the Court — 364 N.C. 609
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided August 27, 2013·No. 289P13·Published

Opinion

1. Def’s Pro Se NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA12-1309)

2. Def’s Pro Se Motion to Appoint Counsel

3. Def’s Pro Se PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Dismissed Ex Mero Motu

2. Dismissed as Moot

3. Denied

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. McCray, 747 S.E.2d 572, 367 N.C. 226, 2013 WL 4781747, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 943 (N.C. 2013).

747 S.E.2d 572 (State v. McCray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 7A-31
North Carolina § 7A-31