State v. McCray

474 So. 2d 856, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1955, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15484
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 13, 1985·No. No. 84-2317·Published

Opinion

FERGUSON, Judge.

Where defendant was convicted and sentenced for strong-armed robbery on a guilty plea after the victim had died from injuries suffered in the course of the offense, the double jeopardy prohibition barred a new prosecution for homicide. Cf. State v. Kirkland, 401 So.2d 1335 (Fla.1981); Southworth v. State, 98 Fla. 1184, 125 So. 345 (1929) (double jeopardy prohibition not a bar to new prosecution for murder where defendant is convicted of strong-armed robbery prior to death of robbery victim). The trial court’s finding, that the State in the exercise of due diligence could have ascertained that the victim succumbed the day prior to the court’s acceptance of the guilty plea, is supported by competent and substantial evidence.

The order dismissing the indictment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. McCray, 474 So. 2d 856, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1955, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15484 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

474 So. 2d 856 (State v. McCray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kirkland
401 So. 2d 1335 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Southworth v. State
125 So. 345 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)