State v. McCoy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. McCoy

328 S.E.2d 620, 285 S.C. 115, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 363

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedApril 1, 1985

Docket22271

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 328 S.E.2d 620 (State v. McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McCoy, 328 S.E.2d 620, 285 S.C. 115, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 363 (S.C. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appellant, James Kevin McCoy, was indicted for participating with a friend in the murder of the friend’s father. He was fifteen years old when arrested. The family court waived jurisdiction after a hearing, and appellant’s case was transferred to the Court of General Sessions where he was tried for murder. Appellant was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Appellant contends the transfer hearing in the family court was tainted because the solicitor’s office failed to reveal allegedly exculpatory evidence pursuant to a Brady request. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L. Ed. (2d) 215 (1963), stands for the proposition that an accused is denied due process at trial if, after making a timely request, he does not receive any exculpatory information the prosecution may hold.

A transfer hearing is not a trial. When considering whether to waive jurisdiction over a juvenile accused of murder, the family court judge uses the public interest as his criterion. Family Court Rule 41. A preliminary determination of guilt would be inappropriate at such a hearing. Since the information appellant sought was provided well before his trial, his reliance on Brady v. Maryland is inappropriate.

Appellant’s other exceptions are without merit.

The conviction and sentence, are, accordingly,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI