State v. McCoy

158 A.3d 321, 325 Conn. 911, 2017 WL 1734433, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 118
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedApril 5, 2017
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 158 A.3d 321 (State v. McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McCoy, 158 A.3d 321, 325 Conn. 911, 2017 WL 1734433, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 118 (Colo. 2017).

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 171 Conn. App. 311, 157 A.3d 97 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's judgment by concluding that, notwithstanding any improper conduct by the state, the defendant was not deprived of a fair trial?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lost jurisdiction to hear the defendant's motion for a new trial?

"3. In the alternative, did the trial court improperly sentence the defendant while his motion for a new trial was pending?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. McCoy
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.3d 321, 325 Conn. 911, 2017 WL 1734433, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mccoy-conn-2017.