Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. McCown

State v. McCown

898 N.E.2d 961, 120 Ohio St. 3d 323
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 9, 2008
DocketNo. 2008-0724
StatusPublished

This text of 898 N.E.2d 961 (State v. McCown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McCown, 898 N.E.2d 961, 120 Ohio St. 3d 323 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Ferguson, 120 Ohio St.3d 7, 2008-Ohio-4824, 896 N.E.2d 110.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Ferguson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ferguson
896 N.E.2d 110 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
898 N.E.2d 961, 120 Ohio St. 3d 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mccown-ohio-2008.