State v. McCovery

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. McCovery

633 So. 2d 156, 1993 La. LEXIS 3715, 1993 WL 589745

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 10, 1993·No. No. 93-KH-2959·Published

Opinion

In re McCovery, Anthony; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 68,892.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to relieve him of his bail obligation pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. art. 701 filed on or about November 8, 1993. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

WATSON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re McCovery, Anthony; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 68,892.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to relieve him of his bail obligation pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. art. 701 filed on or about November 8, 1993. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

WATSON, J., not on panel.

State v. McCovery, 633 So. 2d 156, 1993 La. LEXIS 3715, 1993 WL 589745 (La. 1993).

Pincite

633 So. 2d 156 (State v. McCovery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.