State v. McCormick

329 Or. App. 338
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 29, 2023
DocketA178431
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 329 Or. App. 338 (State v. McCormick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McCormick, 329 Or. App. 338 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

338 November 29, 2023 No. 628

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KYLE ADAM McCORMICK, Defendant-Appellant. Lane County Circuit Court 21CR11681; A178431

Charles D. Carlson, Judge. Submitted October 27, 2023. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Sara F. Werboff, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the briefs for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Colm Moore, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. KAMINS, J. Reversed and remanded. Nonprecedential Memo Op: 329 Or App 338 (2023) 339

KAMINS, J. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for harassment constituting domestic violence, ORS 166.065. After defendant pleaded guilty to the offense, the trial court sentenced him to 36 months’ bench probation and prohibited him from possessing firearms or ammunition under ORS 166.255. Defendant appeals, contending that harassment is not a qualifying misdemeanor for the lifetime firearm pro- hibition under ORS 166.255. In light of this court’s recent decision, we agree. See State v. Eggers, 326 Or App 337, 351, 532 P3d 518 (2023) (holding that the crime of harassment is not a “qualifying misdemeanor” for purposes of the firearm prohibition in ORS 166.255). Accordingly, we reverse defen- dant’s firearm prohibition and remand for resentencing. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. McCormick
341 Or. App. 130 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
329 Or. App. 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mccormick-orctapp-2023.