State v. McCormick

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. McCormick

868 So. 2d 512, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 98, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 307, 2004 WL 393246

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 4, 2004·No. No. SC02-2194·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have on appeal a decision of a district court of appeal declaring invalid a state statute. We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Critchfield, 842 So.2d 782 (Fla.2003), we summarily affirm the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in McCormick v. State, 826 So.2d 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have on appeal a decision of a district court of appeal declaring invalid a state statute. We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Critchfield, 842 So.2d 782 (Fla.2003), we summarily affirm the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in McCormick v. State, 826 So.2d 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

State v. McCormick, 868 So. 2d 512, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 98, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 307, 2004 WL 393246 (Fla. 2004).

Pincite

868 So. 2d 512 (State v. McCormick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related