State v. McCollom

105 A. 789, 30 Del. 277, 7 Boyce 277, 1918 Del. LEXIS 50
New York Court of General Session of the Peace·Decided December 11, 1918·No. Indictment, No. 81·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Ríce, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

A similar application based upon similar grounds was made in the case of State v. McDaniel, 4 Pennewill, 96, 104, 107, 54 Atl. 1056; but the court declined to make an order for a bill of particulars. It is the opinion of the court that the indictment sufficiently informs the accused of the nature and cause of the accusation against him.

The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. McCollom, 105 A. 789, 30 Del. 277, 7 Boyce 277, 1918 Del. LEXIS 50 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1918).

105 A. 789 (State v. McCollom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oppenheim v. Sterling Tire Corp.
126 A. 728 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1924)