State v. McCollom

105 A. 789, 30 Del. 277, 7 Boyce 277, 1918 Del. LEXIS 50
CourtNew York Court of General Session of the Peace
DecidedDecember 11, 1918
DocketIndictment, No. 81
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 105 A. 789 (State v. McCollom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of General Session of the Peace primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McCollom, 105 A. 789, 30 Del. 277, 7 Boyce 277, 1918 Del. LEXIS 50 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1918).

Opinion

Ríce, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

A similar application based upon similar grounds was made in the case of State v. McDaniel, 4 Pennewill, 96, 104, 107, 54 Atl. 1056; but the court declined to make an order for a bill of particulars. It is the opinion of the court that the indictment sufficiently informs the accused of the nature and cause of the accusation against him.

The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oppenheim v. Sterling Tire Corp.
126 A. 728 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 A. 789, 30 Del. 277, 7 Boyce 277, 1918 Del. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mccollom-nygensess-1918.