State v. McClendon

467 S.W.3d 395, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 693, 2015 WL 3959966
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 30, 2015
DocketNo. ED 101537
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 467 S.W.3d 395 (State v. McClendon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McClendon, 467 S.W.3d 395, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 693, 2015 WL 3959966 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Corey McClendon (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County after a jury found him guilty of two counts of forcible sodomy and one count of kidnapping. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for a mistrial during the prosecutor’s cross-examination of Defendant; and (2) failing to sua sponte declare a mistrial during the prosecutor’s closing argument.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corey McClendon v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
467 S.W.3d 395, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 693, 2015 WL 3959966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcclendon-moctapp-2015.