State v. McClellan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. McClellan

870 P.2d 271, 127 Or. App. 128, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 376

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 23, 1994

Docket91-CR2751FE; CA A76937

StatusPublished

This text of 870 P.2d 271 (State v. McClellan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McClellan, 870 P.2d 271, 127 Or. App. 128, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 376 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of two counts of criminal mistreatment in the first degree, ORS 163.205, and two counts of assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160.

We write only to address defendant’s second assignment of error, in which he argues that the assault convictions should have merged into the convictions for criminal mistreatment. The state concedes error, and we accept the concession.

Remanded for entry of amended judgment of conviction and for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of two counts of criminal mistreatment in the first degree, ORS 163.205, and two counts of assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160.

We write only to address defendant’s second assignment of error, in which he argues that the assault convictions should have merged into the convictions for criminal mistreatment. The state concedes error, and we accept the concession.

Remanded for entry of amended judgment of conviction and for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

870 P.2d 271, 127 Or. App. 128, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcclellan-orctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack