State v. McCleary
316 S.E.2d 870, 311 N.C. 397, 1984 N.C. LEXIS 1745
Opinion
We have considered the briefs of the parties, they having by stipulation waived oral argument, on the question of the constitutionality of our statutes controlling lotteries, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 14-289, 14-290, and 14-292.1. We have also considered the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals and the thoughtful, well-reasoned, and thoroughly documented majority opinion of that court justifying its decision sustaining the constitutionality of the questioned statutes. We conclude that the decision should be and it is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. McCleary, 316 S.E.2d 870, 311 N.C. 397, 1984 N.C. LEXIS 1745 (N.C. 1984).
316 S.E.2d 870 (State v. McCleary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Young
535 S.E.2d 380 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
Meads v. North Carolina Department of Agriculture
509 S.E.2d 165 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1998)
In Re Lamm
448 S.E.2d 125 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1994)
Cole v. Hughes
442 S.E.2d 86 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1994)
McNeill v. Harnett County
398 S.E.2d 475 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1990)
Animal Protection Society of Durham, Inc. v. State
382 S.E.2d 801 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1989)
State v. Posey
534 N.E.2d 61 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Wyand
501 A.2d 43 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1985)