State v. McCleary

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. McCleary

316 S.E.2d 870, 311 N.C. 397, 1984 N.C. LEXIS 1745

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJuly 6, 1984

Docket13A84

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 316 S.E.2d 870 (State v. McCleary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McCleary, 316 S.E.2d 870, 311 N.C. 397, 1984 N.C. LEXIS 1745 (N.C. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the briefs of the parties, they having by stipulation waived oral argument, on the question of the constitutionality of our statutes controlling lotteries, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 14-289, 14-290, and 14-292.1. We have also considered the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals and the thoughtful, well-reasoned, and thoroughly documented majority opinion of that court justifying its decision sustaining the constitutionality of the questioned statutes. We conclude that the decision should be and it is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the briefs of the parties, they having by stipulation waived oral argument, on the question of the constitutionality of our statutes controlling lotteries, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 14-289, 14-290, and 14-292.1. We have also considered the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals and the thoughtful, well-reasoned, and thoroughly documented majority opinion of that court justifying its decision sustaining the constitutionality of the questioned statutes. We conclude that the decision should be and it is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

316 S.E.2d 870, 311 N.C. 397, 1984 N.C. LEXIS 1745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mccleary-nc-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack