State v. McClary

586 S.E.2d 466, 357 N.C. 466
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided August 21, 2003·No. 238P03·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

586 S.E.2d 466 (2003)
357 N.C. 466

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Ronald McCLARY.

No. 238P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 21, 2003.

Lisa Miles, for McClary.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st day of August 2003."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st day of August 2003."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. McClary, 586 S.E.2d 466, 357 N.C. 466 (N.C. 2003).

586 S.E.2d 466 (State v. McClary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Remley
686 S.E.2d 160 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
State v. Gayton
648 S.E.2d 275 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)