State v. McCaw

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McCaw

559 S.W.3d 930

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 30, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106016

StatusPublished

This text of 559 S.W.3d 930 (State v. McCaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McCaw, 559 S.W.3d 930 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard Lee McCaw (Appellant) appeals the judgment entered by the trial court after a jury trial convicting him of criminal nonsupport. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and we conclude Appellant's claims are without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Richard Lee McCaw (Appellant) appeals the judgment entered by the trial court after a jury trial convicting him of criminal nonsupport. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and we conclude Appellant's claims are without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 S.W.3d 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mccaw-moctapp-2018.