State v. McCaw

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McCaw

559 S.W.3d 930

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 30, 2018·No. No. ED 106016·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard Lee McCaw (Appellant) appeals the judgment entered by the trial court after a jury trial convicting him of criminal nonsupport. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and we conclude Appellant's claims are without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Richard Lee McCaw (Appellant) appeals the judgment entered by the trial court after a jury trial convicting him of criminal nonsupport. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and we conclude Appellant's claims are without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. McCaw, 559 S.W.3d 930 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

559 S.W.3d 930 (State v. McCaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.