State v. McCarty

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McCarty

431 S.W.3d 538, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 573, 2014 WL 2106738

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 2014·No. No. ED 99231·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a bench trial, Eric McCarty (“Defendant”) now appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding Defendant guilty of fraudulently stopping payment on an instrument, in violation of Section 570.125. [539] We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a bench trial, Eric McCarty (“Defendant”) now appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding Defendant guilty of fraudulently stopping payment on an instrument, in violation of Section 570.125. [539] We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. McCarty, 431 S.W.3d 538, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 573, 2014 WL 2106738 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

431 S.W.3d 538 (State v. McCarty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.