State v. McCannon

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McCannon

535 S.W.3d 429

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 26, 2017

DocketWD 79592

StatusPublished

This text of 535 S.W.3d 429 (State v. McCannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McCannon, 535 S.W.3d 429 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David McCannon appeals his conviction after jury trial in the Johnson County Circuit Court of one count of the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance. He presents two points on appeal. First, he claims the trial court erred in overruling his Batson objection. Second, he claims that his conviction is not supported by sufficient evidence. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a- memorandum has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b). The judgment is affirmed. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David McCannon appeals his conviction after jury trial in the Johnson County Circuit Court of one count of the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance. He presents two points on appeal. First, he claims the trial court erred in overruling his Batson objection. Second, he claims that his conviction is not supported by sufficient evidence. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a- memorandum has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b). The judgment is affirmed. ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

535 S.W.3d 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mccannon-moctapp-2017.