State v. . McCanless

109 S.E. 62, 182 N.C. 843, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 351

• Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
• Decided: November 9, 1921
• Status: Published

Opinion

Hoice, J.

¥e have given the cause most careful consideration and find no reversible error in the record. There was ample evidence for the State to carry the case to the jury, and the issue was submitted in a comprehensive charge by his Honor in which every position favoring the defendant, and arising on the testimony, was sufficiently and fairly presented.

The objections to the rulings of the court on questions of evidence are without merit. The only one at all debatable — the refusal to allow the deputy sheriff, Hobbs, to answer the question whether, when arrested, the defendant did not say he had bought the car from Percy Newman at the time asked- — -was incompetent as tending to draw out a self-serving declaration, and if it became so later in corroboration of defendant’s direct testimony, it was not again offered. And in any event the exception is not available, as the record does not disclose what answer the witness Hobbs would have made.

There is no error, and the judgment below is affirmed.

No error.