State v. McCallum

301 P.3d 965, 256 Or. App. 692, 2013 WL 2146225, 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 533
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 15, 2013
Docket201020073; A147699, A151373
StatusPublished

This text of 301 P.3d 965 (State v. McCallum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McCallum, 301 P.3d 965, 256 Or. App. 692, 2013 WL 2146225, 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 533 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

A jury found defendant guilty of nine offenses: two counts of first-degree sexual abuse; three counts of second-degree unlawful sexual penetration; three counts of first-degree criminal mistreatment; and one count of second-degree animal abuse. He appeals the resulting convictions and sentences, advancing multiple assignments of error. We write to address one of those assignments and reject the others without discussion.

In his third assignment of error, defendant argues that, on each of the three convictions for criminal mistreatment, the trial court imposed 36-months of post-prison supervision, which, when added to defendant’s 36-month prison term, exceeded the five-year statutory maximum indeterminate sentence for those class C felonies. ORS 161.605(3) (maximum term of an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment is, “[flor a Class C felony, 5 years”); OAR 213-005-0002(4) (“The term of post-prison supervision, when added to the prison term, shall not exceed the statutory maximum indeterminate sentence for the crime of conviction.”). The state concedes that the 72-month sentences imposed by the trial court are plainly erroneous, and we agree. See State v. Donner, 230 Or App 465, 469, 215 P3d 928 (2009) (trial court plainly erred in imposing a “total sentence of 72 months — 36 months’ incarceration and 36 months’ post-prison supervision — on a Class C felony”). For the same reasons expressed in Dormer, we exercise our discretion to correct the error in this case.

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Donner
215 P.3d 928 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
301 P.3d 965, 256 Or. App. 692, 2013 WL 2146225, 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mccallum-orctapp-2013.